Journal of Material Culture

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Colloredo-Mansfeld, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Journal of Material Culture, Vol. 8, No. 3, 245-254 (2003)
DOI: 10.1177/13591835030083001
© 2003 SAGE Publications

Introduction

Introduction

Matter Unbound

Rudi Colloredo-Mansfeld

University of Iowa, USA rudi-colloredo{at}uiowa.edu

Orchestrated moments of destruction, cycles of appearance and vanishing, and other material losses recur across time and societies and scales of human action in ways that are pervasive, deeply social, and not anti-materialistic. Our goal with this special issue is to draw attention to the tools, narratives, and settings that people need to exploit ephemerality not just as a social practice but as a material one. We argue that rather than always seeking to objectify things, people undo form to achieve their social effect through working amid an unbounded flow of materiality. Consuming, vanishing, sacrificing, and fashioning all work as techniques of interacting, processes that enhance communities not by committing them to fixed cultural property but by linking people as agents or channels of shared substances. Ephemeral practice, however, is not the negative of objectification, but rather a related set of actions that have special significance for intersubjective experience, negotiating relationships, and the pacing of human interaction.

Key Words: ephemerality • loss • material culture • objectification


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of Material CultureHome page
R. Hitchings
Expertise and Inability: Cultured Materials and the Reason for Some Retreating Lawns in London
Journal of Material Culture, November 1, 2006; 11(3): 364 - 381.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Material CultureHome page
A. Skuse
Enlivened Objects: The Social Life, Death and Rebirth of Radio as Commodity in Afghanistan
Journal of Material Culture, July 1, 2005; 10(2): 123 - 137.
[Abstract] [PDF]